Week Six

We all see them. The cookie cutter images of Presidential, Senatorial or Gubernatorial candidates standing behind podiums in freshly pressed suits, shaking hands and waving at at crowds. However, do these planned imaged and preconceived notions of what a proper candidate should look like influence the success of a campaign entirely?

Jamieson touches on the public spectacle of Presidential campaigning and how now, more than ever, candidates’ images are packaged for media outlets and distributed to content consumers in the privacy of their homes. These perceptions and ads that circulate are important to display the strengths and weaknesses of candidates, showcase the financial backing a candidate has, and reassure the public that said candidate is the right choice.

Katz, in contrast, discusses the two-step flow of communication and supports its hypothesis. The two-step model is the idea that communication flows from media to opinion leaders who then disseminate this information to the public. This suggests that media communication is less direct than previously believed and human interaction plays an important role in the decision making process in the political arena.

Based on your experiences with political campaigns, do you focus more on opinion leader’s beliefs or on the packaged image of a candidate? Do you find your perceptions are changed in an easier manner through connecting with individuals or in the privacy of your own home watching mass media’s interpretation of candidates in an election? What sort of effect would you assume this has on the electorate as a whole?

This entry was posted in Week 6, Winter 2012 and tagged , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

1 Response to Week Six

  1. tommyotoole says:

    Personally, I typically evaluate candidates on an issue to issue basis. I think that I take into account all of the ‘hot topics’ in the mass media during election cycles, but I think I form most of my opinions on personal research where I feel like I can really gauge the quality of the candidate. I think that the mass media does a better job of reinforcing people’s opinions about candidates ins read of potentially changing them. People who watch MSNBC or FoxNews are probably watching it just to hear what they want to hear, so their views will not be challenged to the extent that a personal conversation could.I think as a whole, people develop most of their views in their personal relationships, but the mass media just reinforces them, and they fail to branch out.Obviously, that is just a general statement, but personally, I do not know many people who have had radical political ideology changes. They seem to only reinforce their ideologies through their mass media consumption. Maybe this also applies to the electorate as a whole.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s