Week 12

Early on in this course, we learned about Shirky’s utopist beliefs on what social networking media was becoming capable of. The mobilization of activist groups with efficiency and speed had Shirky believing in a new era of political movements and political activism through social media. Gladwell and Morosov, however, believe that social networking sites, such as Facebook and Twitter, are given too much credit and that it is overstated in what these sites are capable of.

Gladwell starts by recognizing many influential protests that happened decades before the Internet and social media ever came about and then he moved on to talking about the Moldova protests in 2009 and how it was claimed the “Twitter Revolution” even though Twitter had little significance in Moldova. His point is that activism associated with social media are built around weak ties while many effective protests during the Civil Rights Movement were all through the help of activists who had strong ties with other activists. He makes his claim that “Social networks are effective at increasing participation—by lessening the level of motivation that participation requires.” He agrees that social media helps mobilization and motivation through resilience and adaptability, but he argues that without hierarchy (absent from social media) there is no strategy and discipline, which are needed to make any impact at all.

Morosov says the U.S. gives Twitter too much credit on what it can do and uses the protests in Tehran as examples. It’s natural for us to think the group of few Twitter users, in Iran, are somehow connected to the thousands protesting in the streets, but Morosov is saying that that’s not necessarily the case. He states the new media is like the game “Telephone” because “errors accumulate in the transmission process, until the final message has nothing to do with the original.” His argument is that people (Americans and U.S. government) need to get realistic about what the Internet can and cannot do.

I agree with what Morosov is arguing but I don’t completely agree with what Gladwell argues. Gladwell is saying that social media, as a political activism tool, cannot work to help when we’re faced with actual dangers, however, I believe that even if social media is disorganized, without hierarchy and discipline, social media is what leads to and helps people become informed with the issues. Informing the weak-tied connections in social networking sites can lead to people connecting more and building stronger ties and/or lead people to go out and search for ways to find activist groups that have structure and discipline.

Is Twitter and other forms of social media really overstated? Do you agree with Morosov that social media changes the original messages? Do you agree with Gladwell that the weak-tied connections of social media make it harder for activists to make an impact? Do you think Morosov and Gladwell’s claim on Twitter being overstated will continue to worsen or get better as more and more countries/governments become Internet savvy?


About rebyi

This entry was posted in Winter 2012. Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to Week 12

  1. janesugi says:

    To an extent I do believe that Twitter and other social media is overstated. Upon reading the Gladwell article, it really opened my eyes to how slacktivist our society has become. We click “like” or “retweet” articles or join groups, but what is that really doing for anyone if no one actually participates and coordinates? I agree with Gladwell that we with new social media technologies, we are building “weak-ties” of activism rather than the “strong-ties” of activism that we saw in the sixties. These “weak-ties only” encourage slacktivism and thus make it hard for people to collectively commit and participate in high-risk situations.

  2. bridgethi says:

    I believe that Twitter’s power in leading activism is overestimated. I do not think that Twitter is drastically affecting the way in which change is brought about, but I do believe that it is assisting in spreading awareness to people who might not otherwise know of some movements. I definitely agree that social media is creating weak ties, but I do not think this affects activists ability to make an impact. The people who ordinarily would physically get out and do something to create change will still do so. Social media is helping to spread awareness, and though many people will engage in slacktivism, I don’t think these are people who would have participated in activism to begin with. Overall, the weak ties still help to spread awareness which can ultimately assist activists in their goals.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s