The Development of Activist Technology

In his article entitled “Political Factors: Digital Activism in Closed and Open Societies,” Tom Glaisyer discusses the role of social media in political and governmental activism. In particular, he touches on the efforts of several regimes and their successes (or more often failures) in controlling social media. He explains that, although many governments have attempted to block text messages, censor online news, and regulate the Internet, they are often unsuccessful. In Iran in 2009, the Persian government was unable to stop protests from spreading through Twitter because of the pervasiveness of digital media networks. This happened despite efforts by Tehran to limit what could be communicated. In Egypt, the state did have some success in identifying and capturing key activists, but was ultimately unsuccessful in controlling the revolution.
The concept that Glaisyer identifies (that social media is almost unstoppable in the transmission of information) is one that Clay Shirkey and Howard Rheingold have somewhat predicted. Although they reach different conclusions, they both expect that the Internet and social media will play an increasing role in politics and government. Shirkey’s ideas on collective action can be seen in these real-life situations. In “Smart Mobs,” Rheingold also conceptualizes the collaboration of many individuals, especially through the use of social media and the Internet, in his definition of “collective intelligence.” However, it can be argued that the protests in Iran and the revolution in Egypt were simply the results of poor government control and censorship rather than collective action. Which do you think is a better explanation for the events in the Middle East?

This entry was posted in Fall 2012, Week 5. Bookmark the permalink.

1 Response to The Development of Activist Technology

  1. mjslovin says:

    While I cannot argue that poor use of censorship and a weak central government did not help cause the Middle East protests, I believe that collective action is far more powerful. The effects of a thoroughly planned and executed groupthink can completely outweigh any governmental structure, no matter how weak and/or corrupt it may be. Social media provides the most accessible platform for these groups to activate, and I agree with Rheingold’s conceptualization of a collective intelligence.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s