Internet Politics

Social media has changed Internet politics forever.  It has given politicians a powerful marketing tool with low costs all while being an important and integral part of American life.  For week 10 readings, different authors measure the effectiveness of this new type of PR.  Although, an underlying question is one of which all generations can easily obtain, or if its targeted for the youth.  In addition, whether or not there are concerns within its impact on political equality.  I believe that social media aids politicians in gaining a collective reputation yet it is important for them to realize that they cannot depend solely on the Internet to win a campaign.   

The analysis by Hindman, Hernson, and Stokes-Brown shows that voter demographics, candidate characteristics, and strategic and structural variables influence candidates’ propensities to sponsor a Web site, communicate with supporters, reach out to undecided voters, recruit volunteers, and raise money online. (39).  Early scholarship focused on the disparities in the ease of access to social media.  It has been noted that there are disadvantaged groups that lag behind in their Internet use (Hindman, Hernson, Stokes-Brown, 31).  Now, scholarly sources focus more on the “second-level” digital divide—the gap between skilled and unskilled users, and the “third level” digital divide—the gap between the politically engaged and the politically indifferent.  This shows that the use of social media is not generational anymore, but a battle between those who know how to use it, and those who do not.  This is a key factor because now, politicians know that their information is getting out to all ages but there is still a problem between advantaged and disadvantaged consumers of media.   Hindman, Hernson, and Stokes-Brown found that there is evidence of a digital-divide among politicians—candidates with longer careers in electoral politics were consistently less likely to campaign online than those with shorter careers (39).  Thus, it is less important for legislative candidates to use the Internet because of these factors.             

Furthermore, Nielson reinforces these arguments.  This author believes that there is little information to find out what gets citizens involved in Internet politics.  Nielson states that it is important to recognize how dependent and well-funded political organizations are on the wider built of communications environment in today’s relatively open Internet.  Only the most extraordinary political campaign can build its own on the Internet (26).  In addition, Scola highlights that Blue State Digital has become popular and successful because of how it tapped into other spheres of PR—non-partisan advocacy works, culture, and how these collectively play into the political arena.  These articles show that Internet politics is not as easy or successful as people may think.  Although, it is important to note that the combination of the traditional PR and dabbling into different forms of social media can lead to the utmost of success.   

 

Do you think social media has hindered political campaigns?  Should politicians stick to traditional ways of marketing?

Advertisements

About remysarhan

University of Michigan '13 College of Literature, Science & the Arts Communications Concentration President, Chaldean American Student Association 248.798.5666 | rsarhan@umich.edu
This entry was posted in Winter 2012. Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to Internet Politics

  1. coxmarg says:

    Great Post! I believe that using social media or the Internet does not hinder a political campaign but may not do as much as people assume. The Internet campaign always helps, but it may help by tapping into other modes of mobilization. As Lauren reported, Obama got 2/3 of his fundraising from the Internet in both 2008 and 2012.

  2. ksoisson says:

    I agree with the previous comment. The fundraising capabilities that social media possesses are incredible. Also important to remember is the fact that email is still the most powerful online tool to gather support. Lauren said on Monday that email is still by far the best tool available to campaigns, so this tactic (whether it’s considered newer or older social media) plays an important role in campaigning as we saw in the past couple elections.

  3. sheypat says:

    I’m not sure that social media has hindered politics. That would mean that it made the law making process slower and maybe even counterproductive. I do not think that this is the case with social media. I believe that social media helps to inform people who wouldn’t have otherwise been included in the political arena. This includes people who are not overly concerned with politics. By having shortcut methods for them to get slightly informed and knowledgable on political issues, it allows them to be involved in the democratic process and voice a concern. This would probably cause more discussion and deliberation because there are now more voices to take into account, but I don’t think that this necessarily is a bad thing. It is not hindering politics by deliberating more, but making it more democratic because more people are now able to get involved.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s